
In the last episode of
Satyameva
Jayate as Amir Khan explored the world of the “disabled” fellow men and
women of our country, their lust and zeal for life coupled with a deep
acceptance to their disadvantaged conditions stood in stark contrast to the shocking attitude
of insensitivity, indifference and even contempt of the apparently “enabled”
rest of us. The outcome of this general
attitude of apathy and lack of concern is manifestly evident not only in the
way as a society we have completely failed to provide even a modicum of
infrastructural facility to meet the special needs of our disabled brothers and
sisters, but also in the way as individuals we interact with them, our
reactions ranging mostly from a heartless indifference to a disrespectful
condescension. And we nurture this inhuman insensitivity with little
compunction, secured as we are in the belief that these hardships endured by
these people are well deserved consequences of their past actions. In other
words, as briefly mentioned in the show itself, The Theory of Karma, embedded deeply in our national psyche, plays
no insignificant a role in contributing to our shameful insensitivity bordering
on a ruthless hard-heartedness.
There is no denying that The Theory of Karma, for whatever it is
worth, is one of those ideas that
pervades our national consciousness, and shapes in a considerable measure our
national attitude to life. It is one of those ideas that have been around for
millennias and have been reinforced time
and again by philosophers, seers and spiritual masters of this land. The human
mind is preoccupied with finding the unseen
causes behind the seen effects. The
vicissitudes faced by life, we find it unacceptable and unfair an idea to
attribute it to an uncaring randomness. The remarkable arbitrariness in the
apparent difference in the conditions of our lives, in the skewed distribution of talents and
intelligence, and also in the many events impacting our lives profoundly and yet having little or nothing
to do with our conscious actions and endeavors, is rationalized compellingly
and also to an extent conveniently by The Theory of Karma.
“As you sow, so shall
you reap” -this is the underlying sentiment
behind The Theory of Karma that we
invoke to explain the otherwise unexplainable quirks of “fate” . It is because
of the apparent convincing and rational nature of this idea that for ages we
accepted it almost unthinkingly. Though there have been at times certain
individuals who raised a discordant note about this widely accepted theory, in
general, as a Nation for much of our history we accepted it, but often with a shallow understanding and with little imagination. Have we
seriously considered the implications and conclusions that flow from this Theory of Karma in their totality?
If we accept The Theory of Karma to be true how
should it influence our lives?
1.
It implies that our
lives in their entirety are our responsibility. Everything that has happened, that
is happening, and that will happen to us is entirely of our doing.
So in that case not only should we accept whatever falls in our lot without a
murmur of complain, but we should also resist all temptations to point fingers at
others for making our life miserable- whether it be a capricious family member,
or a jealous colleague or a corrupt and callous government. True, Theory of Karma does not take away our capacity to make an effort
to change the unfavorable conditions, but that should happen with a total
absence of any feeling of rancor and bitterness to any other person or system.
How far do we do it?
2.
Acceptance of The Theory of Karma together with the absence of rectitude in our everyday lives makes little sense. If we really
accept that our present actions will shape the future conditions of our lives,
how can we consciously indulge in moral lapses? With the pervasive erosion of
morality and ethics in the Indian society something is seriously amiss here.
Either our understanding of The Theory of
Karma is disturbingly superficial, or we attach far too much importance to
the temptation of the present moment to be mindful of what bearings it might have on
our future. In either case, can we really consider that we take The Theory of Karma with much
seriousness?
3.
For most humans, one
intense desire is to be treated by his fellow men and women with consideration
and fairness, if not with love and kindness. So naturally if we accept The Theory of Karma it follows that we
will treat all our fellow human beings with respect, dignity and fairness that
we would expect to receive from them. It is time we make an internal audit
about the way we interact with people, especially the ones who are seemingly
below our “social” ladder and from whom we have little to gain. Does it not
belie our much touted faith in The Theory
of Karma?
The Theory of Karma if followed and accepted in its totality,
should impel us not only to a life full of action, but also compel us to have a
cheerful disposition even at gravest of times. But let us now consider how what should have been compares with what really is:
1.
Instead of stirring us into vigorous action,
the The Theory of Karma has slowly
numbed us into inaction and slothfulness, so much so we have learnt to accept
almost all miseries and adversities of life not only as inevitable but also as irrefutable consequences of “fate”. In a strangely distorted understanding of the Karma Theory, we have learnt to
attribute the conditions of our lives to the “writings on the forehead”. We
have conveniently forgotten that the same theory demands that just as what we
are faced with depends on our past actions, we have perfectly within us the
capacity to alter those conditions with our present actions. But if we carefully analyze the impact The Theory of Karma on our national
character over centuries, we will see that more often than not it contributed to national
indolence much more than to an exertion to work and action.
2.
While we have
conveniently invoked The Theory of Karma
to justify our otiose lifestyle, we have snugly forgotten it while indulging in
grossly unethical behavior in pursuance of our selfish interests as perceived in the present
moment . Our history, just as our lives have been littered with situations and
instances when we almost inexplicably chose to remain oblivious to the inevitable baneful future effects that our present inappropriate actions will result in following from The Theory of Karma. However
persuasive the Theory of Karma have been, at least in these times and days, it has been an utter failure to wean
us away from immoral and improper behavior, when we think it can go undetected while bringing us considerable gain in the near future.
3.
The most
unconscionable effect The Theory of Karma
have had on our National consciousness is the utter insensitivity, indifference
and the indefensible self-righteousness with which we deal with those unfortunate individuals who have perhaps got the most raw deal from life. Be it
the lowly untouchable, the unfortunate child-widow, the miserable leper or the
gravely ill, as a society we have been hideous in the way we have behaved with
them. And we nurture this inhuman cruelty with little compunction, secured in
the belief that these terrible conditions
endured by these people are well deserved consequences of their past
actions. What can be a more perverse
understanding of The Theory of Karma,
that on one hand does precious little to goad us into an honorable
uncomplaining life of intense activity for a better future, while on the other provides us the perfect alibi to invoke unknown past crimes committed by
those hapless individuals to rationalize their present conditions and
absolve ourselves from any sense of responsibility that our conscience might
otherwise prompt us into.
While we consider
these implications of The Theory of Karma
and the impacts it has on us , both as individuals, and as a society, it is
time we also think about the Theory
itself. I will not get into empirical evidences where at least superficially
the rational understanding of the Theory of Karma makes very little sense,
because to really make a judgment on the Theory
based on such evidences one needs to have the complete information on the lives
and experiences of the concerned subjects, which would be hardly possible. I would rather try to understand the
fundamental premises of the Theory
itself and find out where it leads us to.
1.
Is it actions or intentions that The Theory of
Karma cares about? If it is our actions, then it is as well we would never
know what an action will result in, as once the action is done it assumes a
life of its own and we have very little control of all the resulting
consequences. As the example goes, I take up the action to dig a well for the
thirsty passengers. What a noble action, and so far so good. But what if
someone tumbles and gets drowned? So for that noble altruistic action will I
have to suffer the consequences of causing someone’s untimely death? It makes
little sense to our rational mind. Is it the intentions? As the proverb goes “The road to hell is paved with good
intentions” ! Is it a combination of both? As we start thinking about it
deeply, we will see it is not as obvious as it seemed in the beginning.
2.
If what I face today
is the result of my past actions, and I follow this chain of thought all the way
back, and say for the sake of argument I accept the Theory of Rreincarnation, then we will soon find ourselves trapped
in the chicken and egg problem Which came first? Which cause led to which effect?
3.
Does The Theory of Karma apply to the animals too? If it does it will be highly absurd, because almost all the actions of
the animals (which perhaps, rather unfortunately, holds true for most human beings also) is prompted by instincts. They
can rarely help doing what they end up doing as they are almost entirely in the thrall of their senses. In that
case how does The Theory of Karma
account for the evolution of the animal “soul” from lower forms of bodies,
ultimately to the rarest and the “highest” of all, the human form?
These are uncomfortable
questions. May be there is someone with enough wisdom out there who has a better
understanding of how things work. Even if there is some sense to The Theory of Karma, the total import of it eludes most of us..Over the years we have used this limited and imperfect understanding in a rather perverse way to justify many
of the inadequacies and weaknesses of our human nature. Rather than submitting to this little
understood theory, it will be only more honourable of us if we have the maturity and
courage to accept life as it happens. Rather than surrendering to an unknown
past, it would be more becoming of us to take responsibility of the present
moment. Rather than justifying people’s miseries to unverifiable past “sins”,
it would me more humane of us if we develop a compassionate outlook, which will
urge us to offer the same respect and dignity to others that we expect for
ourselves.